ACSIP

From: Subject: ACSIP Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 11:12:56 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; type="text/html"; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01C94000.9EA65B90" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C94000.9EA65B90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://acsip.state.ar.us/cgi-bin/index.cgi?rm=report_acsip&print=1 ACSIP

School Plan

FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
209 ALFORD ST.,FLIPPIN, AR = 72634

Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement Plan

2008-2009

The Flippin School community will work and = learn=20 together with respect and responsibility in a safe, = focused=20 environment to insure an appropriate education for=20 all.

Grade Span: K-5

Title I: Title I Schoolwide =

School Improvement: =

Table of Contents

Priority 1:=20 Math
    Goal: All = students will=20 become more proficient in the areas of problem = solving, data=20 analysis/probabilty, and geometry as determined by the = analysis of the data from SAT 10, Augmented Benchmark, = and=20 STAR testing which showed these to be weak areas.=20
    Goal: Math students = will=20 become more proficient in answering open-response math = questions as determined by the analysis of the data = from=20 Augmented Benchmark testing which showed this to be a = weak=20 area.
Priority 2:=20 Literacy
    Goal: = Students will=20 become more proficient in reading comprehension = especially in=20 the areas of vocabulary(context,and multiple = meanings),=20 generalization/analysis/infering and transfer of = reading=20 skills and strategies to practical/functional reading = of=20 passages as determined by the analysis of the data of = SAT=20 10,Augmented Benchmark and STAR testing which showed = these to=20 be weak areas.
    Goal: = All=20 students will become more proficient in writing = especially in=20 the areas of style, content and mechanics, and in = answering=20 open-response questions as determined by the analysis = of the=20 data from Augmented Benchmark and Target testing.=20
Priority 4: Health and=20 Wellness
    Goal: = Flippin=20 Elementary School will seek ways to improve the health = and=20 wellness of = students.
    Goal:=20 The Flippin Elementary School will provide support for = students in making Healthy Lifestyle Choices by = implementing=20 systems to aid in increasing collaboration between all = segments of the school community in support of = positive=20 lifestyle choices.

Priority 1:

All students will improve in mathematical = abilities.=20

Supporting Data:

Data Statement Grades 3,4 and 5 Combined=20 Population: Gr. 3 Benchmark Exam: In 2008, 54 = students=20 were tested and 85.2% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2007, 63 students were tested and 76.1% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006, 59 students = were=20 tested and 62.7% scored proficient or advancd. = The=20 lowest identified area(s)(based on the trend = analysis=20 of the open response and multiple choice = questions) in=20 the five mathematics strands, revealed = weaknesses in=20 geometry, data analysis and measurement. = Economically=20 Disadvantaged students: Gr.3 Benchmark Exam: = In 2008,=20 33 students were tested and 81.8% were = proficient or=20 advanced. In 2007, 39 students were tested and = 69.2%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2006, 30 = students=20 were tested and 50.0% scored proficient or = advancd.=20 The lowest identified area(s)(based on the = trend=20 analysis of the open response and multiple = choice=20 questions) in the five mathematics strands, = revealed=20 weaknesses in geometry, data analysis and = measurement.=20 Students with Disabilities: Gr.3 Benchmark = Exam: In=20 2008 7 students were tested and 100% scored = proficient=20 or advanced. In 2007, 8 students were tested = and 50.0%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2006, 6 = students=20 were tested and 16.6% scored proficient or = advancd.=20 The lowest identified area(s)(based on the = trend=20 analysis of the open response and multiple = choice=20 questions) in the five mathematics strands, = revealed=20 weaknesses in geometry, data analysis and = measurement.=20 Combined Population: Gr.4 Benchmark Exam: In = 2008, 61=20 students were tested and 77% scored proficient = or=20 advanced. In 2007,56 students were tested and = 75.0%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2006,68 = students=20 were tested and 51.4% scored proficient or = advancd.=20 The lowest identified area(s)(based on the = trend=20 analysis of the open response questions) in = the five=20 mathematics strands, revealed weaknesses in = data=20 analysis, probability and measurement and = geometry.=20 The lowest identified area(s)(based on the = trend=20 analysis of the multiple choice questions) in = the five=20 mathematics strands, revealed weaknesses in = geometry,=20 data analysis, probability and measurement.=20 Economically Disadvantaged students:Gr.4 = Benchmark=20 Exam: In 2008, 33 students were tested and = 66.7%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2007, 27 = students=20 were tested and 55.5% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2006, 47 students were tested and 48.9% = scored=20 proficient or advancd. The lowest identified=20 area(s)(based on the trend analysis of the = open=20 response questions) in the five mathematics = strands,=20 revealed weaknesses in geometry, data = analysis,=20 probability and measurement. The lowest = identified=20 area(s)(based on the trend analysis of the = multiple=20 choice questions) in the five mathematics = strands,=20 revealed weaknesses in Geometry, measurement, = and data=20 analysis and probability. Students with=20 Disabilities:Gr.4 Benchmark Exam: In 2008, 5 = students=20 were tested and 100% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2007,7 students were tested and 57.1% scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006,5 students = were tested=20 and 20.0% scored proficient or advancd. The = lowest=20 identified area(s)(based on the trend analysis = of the=20 open response questions) in the five = mathematics=20 strands, revealed weaknesses in algebra, data=20 analysis, probability and measurement.The = lowest=20 identified area(s)(based on the trend analysis = of the=20 multiple choice questions) in the five = mathematics=20 strands, revealed weaknesses in Geometry, = measurement,=20 and data analysis and probability. Combined=20 Population:Gr.5 Benchmark Exam: In 2008, 57 = students=20 were tested and 86% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2007,68 students were tested and 64.7% scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006, 83 students = were=20 tested and 43.3% scored proficient or advancd. = The=20 lowest identified area(s)(based on the trend = analysis=20 of the open response and multiple choice = questions) in=20 the five mathematics strands, revealed = weaknesses in=20 data analysis, probability and measurement, = and=20 numbers and operations. Economically = Disadvantaged=20 students:Gr. 5 Benchmark Exam: In 2008 28 = students=20 were tested and 78.6% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2007, 44 students were tested and 61.3% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006, 53 students = were=20 tested and 22.6% scored proficient or advancd. = . The=20 lowest identified area(s)(based on the trend = analysis=20 of the open response and multiple choice = questions)in=20 the five mathematics strands, revealed = weaknesses in=20 data analysis, probability, measurement, and = numbers=20 and operations. Students with Disabilities: = Gr. 5=20 Benchmark Exam: In 2008, 6 students were = tested and=20 66.7% scored proficient or advanced. In 2007, = 7=20 students were tested and 0% scored proficient = or=20 advanced. In 2006, 10 students were tested and = 20.0%=20 scored proficient or advancd. . The lowest = identified=20 area(s)(based on the trend analysis of the = open=20 response and multiple choice questions)in the = five=20 mathematics strands, revealed weaknesses in = data=20 analysis, probability, measurement and numbers = and=20 operations.=20
ACSIP CRT Data Source for FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
Benchmark-3rd Grade Mathematics = Exam=20
Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 2006-# Tested = &=20 Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced:=20
59 Students: 62.7% of Combined Students 30 = Students:50% of Econ. Disadvantaged Students 6 = Students: 16.7% of Students with Disabilities = 2007-#=20 Tested &Percent of Students Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 63 Students:76.2% of = Combined=20 Students 39 Students:69.2% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 8 Students:50% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2008-# Tested & Percent of Students = Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 54 Students:85.2% of = Combined=20 Students 33 Students:81.8% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 7 Students:100% of Students with = Disabilities=20 The lowest identified areas for the combined=20 population were:Geometry, Measurement and Data = &=20 Probability, both multiple choice and open = response=20 questions. The lowest identified areas for = Econ.=20 Disadvantaged students were: Geometry, = Measurement and=20 Data & Probability, both multiple choice = and open=20 response questions. The lowest identified = areas for=20 students with disabilities were: Geometry, = Measurement=20 and Data & Probability, both multiple = choice and=20 open response questions. ACSIP CRT Data Source = for=20 FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Benchmark-4th Grade=20 Mathematics Exam Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 = 2006-#=20 Tested & Percent of Students Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced 68 Students:51.5% of = Combined=20 Students 47 Students:48.9% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 5 Students:20% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2007-# Tested &Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced: 56 Students:75% of = Combined=20 Students 27 Students: 55.6% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Stude 7 Students: 57.1% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2008-# Tested & Percent of Students = Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 61 Students:77% of = Combined=20 Students 33 Students:66.7% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 5 Students:40% of Students with = Disabilities=20 The lowest identified areas for the combined=20 population were:Geometry, Measurement and Data = &=20 Probability, both multiple choice and open = response=20 questions. The lowest identified areas for = Econ.=20 Disadvantaged students were: Geometry, = Measurement and=20 Data & Probability, both multiple choice = and open=20 response questions. The lowest identified = areas for=20 students with Disabilities were:Geometry, = Measurement=20 and Data & Probability, both multiple = choice and=20 open response questions. ACSIP CRT Data Source = for=20 FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Benchmark-5th Grade=20 Mathematics Exam Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 = 2006-#=20 Tested & Percent of Students Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 83 Students:43.4% of = Combined=20 Students 53 Students:22.6% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 10 Students:20% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2007-# Tested &Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced: 68 Students: 64.7% of = Combined=20 Students 44 Students: 61.4% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 7 Students: 0% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2008-# Tested & Percent of Students = Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 57 Students:86% of = Combined=20 Students 28 Students:78.6% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 6 Students:66.7% of Students with=20 Disabilities The lowest identified areas for = the=20 combined population were: Numbers & = Operations,=20 Measurement and Data & Probabilities, both = open=20 response and multiple choice. The lowest = identified=20 areas for Econ. Disadvantaged students were: = Numbers=20 & Operations, Measurement and Data &=20 Probabilities, both open response and multiple = choice.=20 The lowest identified areas for students with=20 Disabilities were: Numbers & Operations,=20 Measurement and Data & Probabilities, both = open=20 response and multiple choice.=20
The ITBS was changed to the SAT10 for the = 2008=20 school year. (Grade 0 test was invalid, test = will be=20 retaken). ITBS Data Statement Iowa Test of = Basic=20 Skills: Combined (Total) Population: Total = Math, Grade=20 0 : In 2007, 68 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 73.5% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 75.8% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,66 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 75.8% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: Problem Solving, Geometry and Number=20 Properties & Operations Iowa Test of Basic = Skills:=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Math, Grade=20 0: In 2007, 57 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 75.4% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 45=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 68.2% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005, 39 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 69.2% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and=20 Skill Cluster Performance reveals the = following areas=20 of concern: Problem Solving, Geometry and = Number=20 Properties & Operations Students with=20 Disabilities: Total Math, Grade 0: In 2007,16 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 43.8% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2006, 13 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 46.2% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2005, 5 students were tested on the ITBS and = 20.0% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of = the=20 Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = Problem=20 Solving, Geometry and Number Properties &=20 Operations Combined (Total) Population: Total=20 Math,Grade 1: In 2007, 69 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 79.7% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2006,53 students were tested on the ITBS and = 84.9% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2005,66 = students were=20 tested on the ITBS and 84.6% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and=20 Skill Cluster Performance reveals the = following areas=20 of concern: Data Interpretation (2 step=20 graphing,comparing quantities)and Geometry=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Math, Grade=20 1: In 2007, 51 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 78.4% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 28=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 78.6% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005, 44 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 79.1% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and=20 Skill Cluster Performance reveals the = following areas=20 of concern: Data Interpretation (2 step=20 graphing,comparing quantities)and Geometry = Students=20 with Disabilities: Total Math, Grade 1: In = 2007,9=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 55.6% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2006, 13 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 61.5% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2005,0 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and N/A% had an NPR score of 50, or above. An = analysis=20 of the Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: Data=20 Interpretation (2 step graphing,comparing=20 quantities)and Geometry Combined (Total) = Population:=20 Total Math, Grade 2 : In 2007, 58 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 60.3% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. In 2006, 64 students were tested on the = ITBS=20 and 60.9% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 73.0% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Problem Solving = single and=20 multiple steps, number Properties and = Operations=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Math, Grade=20 2: In 2007, 34 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 52.9% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 44=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 56.8% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,42 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 66.7% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: Problem Solving(single and multiple = steps),=20 Number Properties & Operations Students = with=20 Disabilities: Total Math, Grade 2: In 2007,7 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 28.6% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2006, 9 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 44.4% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2005,3 students were tested on the ITBS and 0% = had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content=20 Sub skill and Skill Cluster Performance = reveals the=20 following areas of concern: Problem Solving = (single=20 and multiple steps),and Number Properties = &=20 Operations. Combined (Total) Population: Total = Math,=20 Grade 3: In 2007,66 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 71.2% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006,63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 68.3% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,70 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 62.9% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: Problem Solving/ Data analysis, = Probability=20 and Statistics. Economically Disadvantaged = Students:=20 Total Math, Grade 3: In 2007, 42 students were = tested=20 on the ITBS and 64.3% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. In 2006, 32 students were tested on the = ITBS=20 and 53.1% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,=20 46 students were tested on the ITBS and 58.7% = had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content=20 Sub skill and Skill Cluster Performance = reveals the=20 following areas of concern: Problem Solving/ = Data=20 analysis, Probability and Statistics. Students = with=20 Disabilities: Total Math, Grade 3: In 2007,8 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 37.5% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2006, 7 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 28.6% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2005, 4 students were tested on the ITBS and = 0% had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content=20 Sub skill and Skill Cluster Performance = reveals the=20 following areas of concern: Problem Solving/ = Data=20 analysis, Probability and Statistics. Combined = (Total)=20 Population: Total Math, Grade 4 : In 2007, 61 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 65.6% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2006, 71 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 64.8% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2005,87 students were tested on the ITBS and = 65.5% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of = the=20 Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = Problem=20 Solving single and multiple steps, number = Properties=20 and Operations Economically Disadvantaged = Students:=20 Total Math, Grade 4: In 2007, 30 students were = tested=20 on the ITBS and 46.7% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. In 2006, 49 students were tested on the = ITBS=20 and 57.1% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,59=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 59.3% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Problem = Solving(single and=20 multiple steps), Number Properties & = Operations=20 Students with Disabilities: Total Math, Grade = 4: In=20 2007,6 students were tested on the ITBS and = 16.7% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2006, 7 = students were=20 tested on the ITBS and 14.3% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2005,6 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 0% had an NPR score of 50, or above. An = analysis=20 of the Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = Problem=20 Solving (single and multiple steps),and Number = Properties & Operations. Combined (Total)=20 Population: Total Math, Grade 5 : In 2007, 73 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 65.8% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2006, 93 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 65.6% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. In=20 2005,55 students were tested on the ITBS and = 69.1% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of = the=20 Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = Concepts in=20 estimation/measurement, Problem Solving and = Data=20 interpretation. Economically Disadvantaged = Students:=20 Total Math, Grade 5: In 2007, 50 students were = tested=20 on the ITBS and 62.0% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. In 2006, 63 students were tested on the = ITBS=20 and 50.8% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,37=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 62.2% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Concepts in=20 estimation/measurement, Problem Solving and = Data=20 interpretation. Students with Disabilities: = Total=20 Math, Grade 5: In 2007,7 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 0% had an NPR score of 50, or above. = In 2006,=20 12 students were tested on the ITBS and 16.7% = had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. In 2005,5 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 40% had an NPR score of = 50, or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: Concepts in estimation/measurement, = Problem=20 Solving and Data interpretation.=20
Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement = Data=20 Source for FLIPPIN ES NORM REFERENCED TEST -- = Report=20 Completed: Sep 8, 2008 Number Tested and = Percent of=20 Students Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile:=20
COMBINED POPULATION Grade:0 ITBS ITBS = SAT10 Year=20 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 63 68 N/A =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 75.8% 73.5%=20 N/A%
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:0 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 45 = 57 N/A=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 68.2%=20 75.4% N/A%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES = Grade:0 ITBS=20 ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number = Tested 13 16=20 N/A
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving=20 46.2% 43.8% N/A%
Arkansas Comprehensive = School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile: =

COMBINED=20 POPULATION Grade:1
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 53 69 63
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In: Math Problem Solving 79.2% 75.4% 38.1% =
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:1 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 28 51 49 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 71.4% 72.5%=20 36.7%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Grade:1 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 13 = 9 14=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 53.8%=20 44.4% 14.3%
Arkansas Comprehensive School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile:
COMBINED = POPULATION Grade:2 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 = 2007 2008=20
Number Tested 64 58 63
% At/Above 50th = NPR In:=20
Math Problem Solving 59.4% 60.3% 49.2%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:2 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 44 34 43 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 52.3% 52.9%=20 41.9%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Grade:2 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 9 = 7 7=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 44.4%=20 42.9% 42.9%
Arkansas Comprehensive School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile:
COMBINED = POPULATION Grade:3
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 63 66 59
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In:
Math Problem Solving 65.1% 72.7% = 62.7%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:3 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 32 42 37 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 46.9% 66.7%=20 54.1%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Grade:3 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 7 = 8 7=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 28.6%=20 37.5% 57.1%
Arkansas Comprehensive School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile: =

COMBINED=20 POPULATION Grade:4
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 71 61 68
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In:
Math Problem Solving 64.8% 73.8% = 76.5%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:4 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 49 30 40 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 61.2% 60.0%=20 65.0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Grade:4 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 7 = 6 4=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 14.3%=20 16.7% 50.0%
Arkansas Comprehensive School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile: =

COMBINED=20 POPULATION Grade:5
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 93 73 58
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In:
Math Problem Solving 68.8% 64.4% = 69.0%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:5 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 63 50 28 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem Solving = 55.6% 60.0%=20 60.7%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Grade:5 = ITBS ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 12 = 7 4=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Math Problem = Solving 25.0%=20 0.0% 50.0%
Attendance Rate for Flippin Elementary:In = 2006,=20 the atttendance rate was 94%.In 2007, the = attendance=20 rate was 95.4%. In 2008, the attendance rate = was=20 91.13%.

Goal

All students will become more proficient in = the=20 areas of problem solving, data = analysis/probabilty, and=20 geometry as determined by the analysis of the = data from=20 SAT 10, Augmented Benchmark, and STAR testing = which=20 showed these to be weak areas.

Benchmark

As of the 2007-08 test results, the percentage = of=20 students scoring at or above proficiency on the=20 Augmented Benchmark math test is 75% with the = state AYP=20 being 62.5% for 2008-09.

Intervention: Students' math = scores=20 will be improved through Curriculum = Alignment.=20

Scientific Based Research:=20 "Large-Scale Assessments Combined With = Curriculum=20 Alignment: Agents of Change", Jean J. = McGehee and=20 Linda K. Griffith, Theory Into Practice; = (Spring=20 2001), Vol.40 Issue 2. "Alignment of = Mathematics=20 State-Level Standards and Assessments: The = Role of=20 Reviewer Agreement", Noreen M. Webb, Joan = L.=20 Hernam, Norman L. Webb, Educational = Measurement=20 v.26 no. 2 (Summer 2007)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Three 1.0 FTE certified teachers will be = assigned to work with small student groups = for=20 intensive math and literacy curriculum=20 instruction. Differentiated student = interactions=20 via ability grouping within classrooms = along with=20 team teaching and double block scheduling = will=20 provide students with resources to = increase skill=20 mastery and participate in enrichment = activities.=20 Certified teachers will meet weekly in = curriculum=20 collaboration to ensure vertical and = horizontal=20 alignment, best classroom practices, and=20 strategies for increased student = achievement in=20 math and literacy.
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Title I Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
District Staff
Teachers

$184749

Title II-A - Employee Salaries:	$39600.00
Title II-A - Employee Benefits:	$9505.00
Title I - Employee Salaries:	$109164.00
Title I - Employee Benefits:	$26480.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Flippin Elementary staff will = disaggregate the=20 data from Augmented Benchmark, SAT10, STAR = and=20 Target testing to evaluate the = effectiveness of=20 the curriculum alignment, the use of the = pacing=20 guides and implementation of TIA and will=20 recommend needed changes to address any = curriculum=20 weaknesses as indicated by the=20 assessments.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Program=20 Evaluation

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Special education staff, administration = and=20 preschool staff will met annually in the = spring to=20 evaluate and assess incoming students from = preschool as they transition into=20 kindergarten
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Special=20 Education

Karla Elliot

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary staff will receive = Total=20 Instructional Alignment (TIA) training and = will=20 begin to implement TIA school wide through = ongoing=20 inservice, book study,the use of pacing = guides,=20 weekly grade level and department meetings = as well=20 as monthly grade level and department = chairpersons=20 meetings to help vertically and = horizontally align=20 curriculum.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Professional=20 Development
Action Type: Program=20 Evaluation

Marilyn Muehler/ Anna Mattson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Academic Improvement Plans will be = written and=20 implemented for students scoring below the = proficient level.
Action Type:=20 AIP/IRI
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Parental Engagement

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

$184749

Intervention: Student's math = scores=20 will improve using standards-based math in = grades=20 2 through 5.

Scientific Based Research: = Brem,=20 S.K. "AM Users Outperform Controls When = Exposure=20 and Quality of Interaction are High: A = Two-Year=20 Study of the Effects of Accelerated Math = on Math=20 Performance in a Title I Elementary = School."=20 Technical Report. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State = University, 2003.

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Teachers will be provided training in = the=20 management and use of Accelerated Math, = Compass=20 Learning, Study Island and A+ software. =
Action=20 Type: Alignment
Action Type: = Professional=20 Development
Action Type: Technology=20 Inclusion
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Michelle Curtis/Sherry Ford

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Outside Consultants
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Periodic growth reports will be = generated by=20 Accelerated Math, Compass Learning, Study = Island=20 and A+ to determine the effectiveness of = the=20 programs and areas of instructional=20 weakness.
Action Type: Program=20 Evaluation

Michelle Curtis/Sherry Ford

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Student's math scores will be improved = through=20 the implementation of Accelerated Math, = Compass=20 Learning, Study Island and A+.
Action = Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: Special=20 Education
Action Type: Technology=20 Inclusion
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Michelle Curtis/Sherry Ford

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Computers
Teachers
Title Teachers

$1000

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$1000.00

ACTION BUDGET:

All third through fifth grade students = will be=20 assessed through TARGET testing=20 quarterly.
Action Type: = Alignment

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

$1000

Intervention: Students' math = scores=20 will be improved through small group = remediation.=20

Scientific Based Research:=20 "Small-Group Reflections: Parallels = Between=20 Teacher Discourse and Student Behavior i=20 Peer-Directed Groups" Noreen M. Webb, = Journal of=20 the Learning Sciences 2006, Vol. 15, No. = 1;

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Special Education teachers will confer = with=20 classroom teachers to develop an IEP for = special=20 needs students in math.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Equity
Action=20 Type: Special Education

Karla Elliott

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All students will have access to = remediation=20 through computer labs, computers in = classrooms and=20 special education classrooms targeted = toward=20 student needs in math.
Action Type:=20 AIP/IRI
Action Type: Special=20 Education
Action Type: Technology=20 Inclusion
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Gary Rosa

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Computers
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Teachers will be provided opportunities = to=20 keep current with the research and = accepted=20 practices in mathematics through = inservices and=20 workshops.
Action Type: Professional=20 Development
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Outside Consultants
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All third through fifth grade students = will be=20 assessed through TARGET testing quarterly, = and=20 upon receipt of the Augmented Benchmark = scores,=20 the effectiveness of small group = remediation will=20 be evaluated.
Action Type: = Equity
Action=20 Type: Program Evaluation
Action Type: = Title I=20 Schoolwide

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

In compliance with Act 307, Parent = Involvement=20 strategies will be integrated into all = areas of=20 the school environment.
Action Type: = Parental=20 Engagement

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Goal

Math students will become more proficient in=20 answering open-response math questions as = determined by=20 the analysis of the data from Augmented = Benchmark=20 testing which showed this to be a weak = area.

Benchmark

As of the 2007-08 test results, the percentage = of=20 students scoring at or above proficiency on the=20 Augmented Benchmark math test is 75% with the = state AYP=20 being 62.5% for 2008-09.

Intervention: Students' math = scores=20 will be improved through emphasis on=20 problem-solving strategies.

Scientific Based Research:=20 = www.fcps.k12.va.us/DeerParkES/kids/diane/Math/tenstrat.htm=20 Ten math strategies for problem solving; = "Teaching=20 and Learning Through Problem Solving", = Mike=20 Ollerton, Mathematics Teaching = Incorporating=20 Micromath, n201 (March 2007); "A = Problem-Solving=20 Model for Improving Student Achievement", = Andrea=20 Canter, Principal Leadership Magazine, = Vol. 5,=20 No.4, (Dec. 2004)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Grade level teachers will establish = standards=20 and develop rubrics for assessing student = writing=20 in problem-solving situations for each = grade=20 level.
Action Type: Alignment
Action = Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Professional = Development
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Teachers will be provided with workshop=20 opportunities on teaching problem-solving = skills=20 and strategies.
Action Type: = Professional=20 Development
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Outside = Consultants


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Students will use Problem Solver 4, = Problem=20 Solver 5, and Problem of the Day to = improve=20 proficiency in answering open response=20 questions.
Action Type: = AIP/IRI
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Equity

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Periodically, Problem Solver 4, Problem = Solver=20 5 and Problem of the Day will be evaluated = to=20 determine effectiveness on student = improvement.=20
Action Type: Program = Evaluation

Michelle Curtis

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All third through fifth grade students = will be=20 assessed through TARGET testing=20 quarterly.
Action Type: = Alignment

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary School is in = compliance=20 with the 10 components of Title I=20 Schoolwide.
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

District Staff


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Priority 2:

All students will improve literacy skills = across the=20 curriculum.

Supporting Data:

Data Statement Grades 3,4,and 5 Combined=20 population: 3rd grade Benchmark: In 2008, 54 = students=20 were tested and 74.1% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2007, 63 students were tested and 69.8% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006, 59 students = were=20 tested and 55.9% scored proficient or = advanced. The=20 lowest identified area(s) (based on the trend = analysis=20 of the open response and multiple choice = questions) in=20 the three literacy skill areas revealed = weaknesses in=20 practical passage, reading = comprehension/inference and=20 open response in all areas. The trend analysis = of the=20 five writing domains revealed that the lowest=20 identified areas are: content,style and = sentence=20 formation. Economically Disadvantaged: 3rd = grade=20 Benchmark: In 2008, 33 students were tested = and 69.7%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2007, 39 = students=20 were tested and 58.9% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2006, 30 students were tested and 36.6% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in practical = passage,=20 reading comprehension/inference and open = response in=20 all areas. The trend analysis of the five = writing=20 domains revealed that the lowest identified = areas are:=20 content,style and sentence formation. Students = with=20 Disabilities: 3rd grade Benchmark: In 2008, 7 = students=20 were tested and 57.1% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2007, 8 students were tested and 25.0% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2006, 6 students = were=20 tested and 16.6% scored proficient or = advanced. The=20 lowest identified area(s) (based on the trend = analysis=20 of the open response and multiple choice = questions) in=20 the three literacy skill areas revealed = weaknesses in=20 practical passage, reading = comprehension/inference and=20 open response in all areas. The trend analysis = of the=20 five writing domains revealed that the lowest=20 identified areas are: content,style and = sentence=20 formation. Combined population: 4th grade = Benchmark:=20 In 2008, 61 students were tested and 70.5% = were=20 proficient or advanced. In 2007, 56 students = were=20 tested and 67.8% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2006, 68 students were tested and 57.3% scored = proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in content and = practical=20 passages,and open response in all areas. The = trend=20 analysis of the five writing domains revealed = that the=20 lowest identified areas are: content and style = Economically Disadvantaged: 4th grade = Benchmark: In=20 2008, 33 studnets were tested and 57.6% scored = proficient or advanced. In 2007, 27 students = were=20 tested and 51.8% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2006, 47 students were tested and 53.1% scored = proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in content passage,=20 practical passage, and open response in all = areas. The=20 trend analysis of the five writing domains = revealed=20 that the lowest identified areas are: content = and=20 style. Students with Disabilities: 4th grade=20 Benchmark: In 2008, 5 students were tested and = 40%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2007, 7 = students=20 were tested and 28.5% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 In 2006, 5 students were tested and 20.0% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in content passage,=20 practical passages, and open response in all = areas.=20 The trend analysis of the five writing domains = revealed that the lowest identified areas are: = content=20 and style. Combined population: 5th grade = Benchmark:=20 In 2008, 57 students were tested and 77.2% = scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2007, 68 students = were=20 tested and 66.1% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2006, 83 students were tested and 56.6% scored = proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in content and = literacy=20 passages,and multiple choice in all areas. The = trend=20 analysis of the five writing domains revealed = that the=20 lowest identified areas are: content and = style.=20 Economically Disadvantaged: 5th grade = Benchmark: In=20 2008, 28 students were tested and67.9% scored=20 proficient or advanced. In 2007, 44 students = were=20 tested and 59.0% scored proficient or = advanced. In=20 2006, 53 students were tested and 35.8% scored = proficient or advanced. The lowest identified = area(s)=20 (based on the trend analysis of the open = response and=20 multiple choice questions) in the three = literacy skill=20 areas revealed weaknesses in content and = literacy=20 passages and open response in all areas. The = trend=20 analysis of the five writing domains revealed = that the=20 lowest identified areas are: content,and = style.=20 Students with Disabilities: 5th grade = Benchmark: In=20 2008, 6 students were tested and 50% were = proficient=20 or advanced. In 2007, 7 students were tested = and 0.0%=20 scored proficient or advanced. In 2006, 10 = students=20 were tested and 10.0% scored proficient or = advanced.=20 The lowest identified area(s) (based on the = trend=20 analysis of the open response and multiple = choice=20 questions) in the three literacy skill areas = revealed=20 weaknesses in content and literacy passage, = and open=20 response in all areas. The trend analysis of = the five=20 writing domains revealed that the lowest = identified=20 areas are: content, and style.=20
ACSIP CRT Data Source for FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
Benchmark-3rd Grade Literacy Exam=20
Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 2006-# Tested = &=20 Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced:=20
59 Students:55.9% of Combined Students =
30=20 Students: 36.7% of Econ. Disadvantaged = Students 6=20 Students:16.7% of Students with Disabilities=20
2007-# Tested & Percent of Students = Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced:
63 Students:69.8% of = Combined=20 Students
39 Students: 59% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students 8 Students: 25% of Students with = Disabilities=20 2008-# Tested & Percent of Students = Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced: 54 Students:74.1% of = Combined=20 Students 33 Students:69.7% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students
7 Students: 57.1% of Students = with=20 Disabilities
The lowest identified areas = for the=20 combined population were: In Reading: = Practical=20 passages, comprehension/inference, and open = response=20 in all areas. In Writing: Content, style and = sentence=20 formation. The lowest identified areas for = Econ.=20 Disadvantaged students were: In Reading: = Practical=20 passages, comprehension/inference, and open = response=20 in all areas. In Writing: Content, style and = sentence=20 formation. The lowest identified areas for = students=20 with disabilities: In Reading: Practical = passages,=20 comprehension/inference, and open response in = all=20 areas. In Writing: Content, style and sentence = formation. ACSIP CRT Data Source for FLIPPIN=20 ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Benchmark-4th Grade Literacy = Exam=20
Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 2006-# Tested = &=20 Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced:=20
68 Students:57.4% of Combined Students =
47=20 Students: 53.2% of Econ. Disadvantaged = Students 5=20 Students:20% of Students with Disabilities = 2007-#=20 Tested & Percent of Students Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced:
56 Students:67.9% of = Combined=20 Students
27 Students: 51.9% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students
7 Students: 28.6% of Students = with=20 Disabilities
2008-# Tested & Percent = of=20 Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced:
61 = Students:=20 70.5% of Combined Students
33 Students: = 57.6% of=20 Econ. Disadvantaged Students 5 Students: 40% = of=20 Students with Disabilities
The lowest = identified=20 areas for the combined population were: In = Reading:=20 Content and Practical Passages. In Writing: = Content=20 and Style The lowest identified areas for = Econ.=20 Disadvantaged students were: In Reading: = Content and=20 Practical Passages. In Writing: Content and = Style The=20 lowest identified areas for students with = Disabilities=20 were: In Reading: Content and Practical = Passages. In=20 Writing: Content and Style ACSIP CRT Data = Source for=20 FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Benchmark-5th = Grade=20 Literacy Exam
Report Created: Sep 4, 2008 = 2006-#=20 Tested & Percent of Students Scoring=20 Proficient/Advanced:
83 Students:56.6% of = Combined=20 Students
53 Students: 35.8% of Econ. = Disadvantaged=20 Students
10 Students: 10% of Students with = Disabilities
2007-# Tested & Percent = of=20 Students Scoring Proficient/Advanced:
68 = Students:=20 66.2% of Combined Students
44 = Students:59.1% of=20 Econ. Disadvantaged Students
7 Students:0% = of=20 Students with Disabilities
2008-# Tested = &=20 Percent of Students Scoring = Proficient/Advanced:=20
57 Students: 77.2% of Combined Students =
28=20 Students: 67.9% of Econ. Disadvantaged = Students
6=20 Students: 50% of Students with Disabilities =
The=20 lowest identified areas for the combined = population=20 were: In reading: Content and literacy = passages. In=20 Writing: Content and style. The lowest = identified=20 areas for Econ. Disadvantaged students were: = In=20 reading: Content and literacy passages. In = Writing:=20 Content and style. The lowest identified areas = for=20 students with Disabilities were: In reading: = Content=20 and literacy passages. In Writing: Content and = style.=20
The ITBS was changed to SAT10 for the 2008 = school=20 year. (Grade 0 test invalid; must be retaken.) = ITBS=20 Data Statement Iowa Test of Basic Skills: = Combined=20 (Total) Population: Total Reading = Comprehension, Grade=20 0 : In 2007, 68 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 70.6% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 71.4% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,66 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 72.7% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: operational language, classification, = singular/plural usage. Iowa Test of Basic = Skills:=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Reading=20 Comprehension, Grade 0: In 2007, 57 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 70.2% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2006, 45 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 64.4% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,=20 39 students were tested on the ITBS and 64.1% = had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content=20 Sub skill and Skill Cluster Performance = reveals the=20 following areas of concern: operational = language,=20 classification, singular/plural usage. = Students with=20 Disabilities: Total Reading Comprehension, = Grade 0: In=20 2007,16 students were tested on the ITBS and = 50.0% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2006, 13 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 38.5% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2005, 5 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 20.0% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. An=20 analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 operational language, classification, = singular/plural=20 usage. Combined (Total) Population: Total = Reading=20 Comprehension ,Grade 1: In 2007, 69 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 73.5% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2006,53 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 77.4% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,66=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 80.3% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Spelling (v/c = combination=20 and affixes), usage and expression and = vocabulary.=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Reading=20 Comprehension, Grade 1: In 2007, 51 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 68.0% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2006, 28 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 64.3% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,=20 44 students were tested on the ITBS and 72.7% = had an=20 NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content=20 Sub skill and Skill Cluster Performance = reveals the=20 following areas of concern: Spelling (v/c = combination=20 and affixes), usage and expression and = vocabulary.=20 Students with Disabilities: Total Reading=20 Comprehension, Grade 1: In 2007,9 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 50.0% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. In 2006, 13 students were tested on the = ITBS=20 and 46.2% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,0=20 students were tested on the ITBS and N/A% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Spelling (v/c = combination=20 and affixes), usage and expression and = vocabulary.=20 Combined (Total) Population: Total Reading=20 comprehension, Grade 2 : In 2007, 58 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 70.7% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2006, 64 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 65.6% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 69.8% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Vocabulary, = sentence and=20 story comprehension. Economically = Disadvantaged=20 Students: Total Reading Comprehension, Grade = 2: In=20 2007, 34 students were tested on the ITBS and = 61.8%=20 had an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2006, 44 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 59.1% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2005,42 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 64.3% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. An=20 analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 Vocabulary, sentence and story comprehension. = Students=20 with Disabilities: Total Reading = comprehension, Grade=20 2: In 2007,7 students were tested on the ITBS = and=20 42.9% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 9=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 44.4% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,3 students were = tested=20 on the ITBS and 0% had an NPR score of 50, or = above.=20 An analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 Vocabulary, sentence and story comprehension. = Combined=20 (Total) Population: Total Reading = Comprehension, Grade=20 3: In 2007,66 students were tested on the ITBS = and=20 62.1% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006,63=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 66.7% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,70 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 67.1% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: phonetic awareness and decoding and = reading=20 comprehension/inferences. Economically = Disadvantaged=20 Students: Total Reading comprehension, Grade = 3: In=20 2007, 42 students were tested on the ITBS and = 54.8%=20 had an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2006, 32 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 50.0% had an NPR = score of=20 50, or above. In 2005, 46 students were tested = on the=20 ITBS and 65.2% had an NPR score of 50, or = above. An=20 analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 phonetic awareness and decoding and reading=20 comprehension/inferences. Students with = Disabilities:=20 Total Reading Comprehension, Grade 3: In = 2007,8=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 25.0% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2006, 7 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 0.0% had an NPR score of 50, = or above.=20 In 2005, 4 students were tested on the ITBS = and 0% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. An analysis of = the=20 Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = phonetic=20 awareness and decoding and reading=20 comprehension/inferences. Combined (Total) = Population:=20 Total Reaading Comprehension, Grade 4 : In = 2007, 61=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 65.6% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2006, 71 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 74.6% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2005,87 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 66.7% had an NPR score of 50, or above. An = analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 Vocabulary, mechanics, analysis and = generalizations=20 Economically Disadvantaged Students: Total = Reading=20 Comprehension, Grade 4: In 2007, 30 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 46.7% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2006, 49 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 71.4% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2005,59=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 59.3% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. An analysis of the = Content Sub=20 skill and Skill Cluster Performance reveals = the=20 following areas of concern: Vocabulary, = mechanics,=20 analysis and generalizations Students with=20 Disabilities: Total Reading comprehension, = Grade 4: In=20 2007,6 students were tested on the ITBS and = 16.7% had=20 an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2006, 7 = students were=20 tested on the ITBS and 43.9% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2005,6 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 0% had an NPR score of 50, or above. An = analysis=20 of the Content Sub skill and Skill Cluster = Performance=20 reveals the following areas of concern: = Vocabulary,=20 mechanics, analysis and generalizations = Combined=20 (Total) Population: Total Reading = Comprehension, Grade=20 5 : In 2007, 73 students were tested on the = ITBS and=20 69.9% had an NPR score of 50, or above. In = 2006, 93=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 72.0% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2005,55 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 70.91% had an NPR score of 50, = or=20 above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and Skill=20 Cluster Performance reveals the following = areas of=20 concern: Analysis and generalizations, = spelling and=20 punctuation. Economically Disadvantaged = Students:=20 Total Reading comprehension, Grade 5: In 2007, = 50=20 students were tested on the ITBS and 70.0% had = an NPR=20 score of 50, or above. In 2006, 63 students = were=20 tested on the ITBS and 60.3% had an NPR score = of 50,=20 or above. In 2005,37 students were tested on = the ITBS=20 and 62.2% had an NPR score of 50, or above. An = analysis of the Content Sub skill and Skill = Cluster=20 Performance reveals the following areas of = concern:=20 Analysis and generalizations, spelling and=20 punctuation. Students with Disabilities: Total = reading=20 Comprehension, Grade 5: In 2007,7 students = were tested=20 on the ITBS and 0% had an NPR score of 50, or = above.=20 In 2006, 12 students were tested on the ITBS = and 25.0%=20 had an NPR score of 50, or above. In 2005,5 = students=20 were tested on the ITBS and 0% had an NPR = score of 50,=20 or above. An analysis of the Content Sub skill = and=20 Skill Cluster Performance reveals the = following areas=20 of concern: Analysis and generalizations, = spelling and=20 punctuation.=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Arkansas = Comprehensive=20 School Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ES=20
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report Completed: = Sep 8,=20 2008
Number Tested and Percent of Students = Scoring=20 At/Above 50th Percentile:

COMBINED = POPULATION=20 Grade:0
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 = 2008=20
Number Tested 63 68 N/A
% At/Above = 50th NPR=20 In:
Reading Comprehension 65.1% 63.2% N/A% =
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:0 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 45 57 = N/A
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading Comprehension = 62.2%=20 59.6% N/A%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES = Grade:0 ITBS=20 ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number = Tested 13 16=20 N/A
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading = Comprehension=20 61.5% 62.5% N/A%
Arkansas Comprehensive = School=20 Improvement Data Source for
FLIPPIN = ELEMENTARY=20 SCHOOL
NORM REFERENCED TEST -- Report = Completed:=20 Sep 8, 2008
Number Tested and Percent of = Students=20 Scoring At/Above 50th Percentile: =

COMBINED=20 POPULATION Grade:1
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 53 69 63
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In:
Reading Comprehension 81.1% 81.2% = 42.9%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:1 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 28 51 49 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading Comprehension = 71.4%=20 78.4% 40.8%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES = Grade:1=20 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number = Tested=20 13 9 14
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading=20 Comprehension 61.5% 55.6% 28.6%
Arkansas=20 Comprehensive School Improvement Data Source = for=20
FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
NORM = REFERENCED TEST=20 -- Report Completed: Sep 8, 2008
Number = Tested and=20 Percent of Students Scoring At/Above 50th = Percentile:=20

COMBINED POPULATION Grade:2
ITBS = ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 64 = 58 63=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In:
Reading = Comprehension=20 65.6% 74.1% 38.1%
STUDENTS WITH = DISABILITIES=20 Grade:2 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008 =
Number=20 Tested 9 7 7
% At/Above 50th NPR In: = Reading=20 Comprehension 44.4% 42.9% 14.3% =
ECONOMICALLY=20 DISADVANTAGED Grade:2 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year = 2006 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 44 34 43
% At/Above = 50th=20 NPR In: Reading Comprehension 56.8% 61.8% = 34.9%=20
Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement = Data=20 Source for
FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =
NORM=20 REFERENCED TEST -- Report Completed: Sep 8, = 2008=20
Number Tested and Percent of Students = Scoring=20 At/Above 50th Percentile:

COMBINED = POPULATION=20 Grade:3
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 = 2008=20
Number Tested 63 66 59
% At/Above 50th = NPR In:=20
Reading Comprehension 63.5% 59.1% 50.8%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:3 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 32 42 37 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading Comprehension = 46.9%=20 57.1% 45.9%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES = Grade:3=20 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number = Tested=20 7 8 7
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading=20 Comprehension 28.6% 37.5% 42.9%
Arkansas=20 Comprehensive School Improvement Data Source = for=20
FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
NORM = REFERENCED TEST=20 -- Report Completed: Sep 8, 2008
Number = Tested and=20 Percent of Students Scoring At/Above 50th = Percentile:=20

COMBINED POPULATION Grade:4
ITBS = ITBS=20 SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 71 = 61 68=20
% At/Above 50th NPR In:
Reading = Comprehension=20 71.8% 67.2% 63.2%
ECONOMICALLY = DISADVANTAGED=20 Grade:4 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008 =
Number=20 Tested 49 30 40
% At/Above 50th NPR In: = Reading=20 Comprehension 69.4% 50.0% 52.5%
STUDENTS = WITH=20 DISABILITIES Grade:4 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 = 2007=20 2008
Number Tested 7 6 4
% At/Above = 50th NPR=20 In: Reading Comprehension 28.6% 16.7% 25.0%=20
Arkansas Comprehensive School Improvement = Data=20 Source for
FLIPPIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL =
NORM=20 REFERENCED TEST -- Report Completed: Sep 8, = 2008=20
Number Tested and Percent of Students = Scoring=20 At/Above 50th Percentile:

COMBINED = POPULATION=20 Grade:5
ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 = 2008=20
Number Tested 93 73 58
% At/Above 50th = NPR In:=20
Reading Comprehension 68.8% 67.1% 63.8%=20
ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Grade:5 ITBS = ITBS SAT10=20 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number Tested 63 50 28 =
%=20 At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading Comprehension = 55.6%=20 66.0% 50.0%
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES = Grade:5=20 ITBS ITBS SAT10 Year 2006 2007 2008
Number = Tested=20 12 7 4
% At/Above 50th NPR In: Reading=20 Comprehension 16.7% 14.3% 25.0%
Attendance Rate for Flippin Elementary: In = 2008,=20 the attendance rate was 93.13%. In 2007, the=20 attendance rate was 95.4%. In 2006, the = atttendance=20 rate was 94%.

Goal

Students will become more proficient in = reading=20 comprehension especially in the areas of=20 vocabulary(context,and multiple meanings),=20 generalization/analysis/infering and transfer of = reading=20 skills and strategies to practical/functional = reading of=20 passages as determined by the analysis of the = data of=20 SAT 10,Augmented Benchmark and STAR testing = which showed=20 these to be weak areas.

Benchmark

As of the 2007-08 test results, the percentage = of=20 students scoring proficient or above on = Benchmark=20 literacy test was 73% with the state AYP being = 64% for=20 2008-09.

Intervention: Students' = literacy=20 tests scores will be improved through=20 comprehensive literacy Curriculum = Alignment.=20

Scientific Based Research: = "Using=20 Data to Drive Student Achievement in the=20 Classroom", H. W. Wilson Co., T.H.E. = Journal 30=20 no.6 (Jan.2003; "Curriculum Mapping: = Bulding=20 Collaboration and Communication", Angela = Koppang,=20 Intervention in School and Clinic, Vol 39, = No.3=20 (Jan. 2004)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

All students will have access to = technology=20 for curriculum enhancement through Compass = Learning, Accelerated Reading, Study = Island and=20 A+.
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action Type:=20 Equity
Action Type: Special = Education
Action=20 Type: Technology Inclusion

Michelle Curtis/Sherry Ford

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Computers
District Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Literature trade books will used to = enhance=20 student interest and introduce the writing = process=20 for each unit according to the curriculum=20 frameworks.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type:=20 Equity
Action Type: Title I = Schoolwide

Pam Hudson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers
Teaching Aids

$1000

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$1000.00

ACTION BUDGET:

First and second grade students = exhibiting=20 substantial difficulties in reading will = be=20 identified (DIBELS) and have an intensive = reading=20 improvement plan (IRI) = implemented.
Action=20 Type: AIP/IRI
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: Title = I=20 Schoolwide

Pam Hudson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

The school meets the following = attributes of a=20 schoolwide project-needs assessment, = schoolwide=20 reform strategies, highly qualified = teachers,=20 professional development, strategies to = attract=20 HQT, parent involvement, transition, = measures to=20 include teachers in decision making, = point-in-time=20 remediation, and coordination and = integration of=20 programs.
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Pam Hudson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary staff will = disaggregate the=20 data from Augmented Benchmark,SAT 10, STAR = and=20 Target testing to evlauate the = effectiveness of=20 the curriculum alignment, the use of the = pacing=20 guides and implementation of TIA and will=20 recommend needed changes to address any = curriculum=20 weaknesses as indicated by the assessments = of=20 literacy strategies.
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Program Evaluation

Pam Hudson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary School is in = compliance=20 with the 10 components of Title I=20 Schoolwide.
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

District Staff


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Special education staff, administration = and=20 preschool staff will meet annually in the = spring=20 to evaluate and assess incoming students = from=20 preschool as they transition into=20 kindergarten
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Special=20 Education

Karla Elliot

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Marilyn Muehler/ Anna Mattson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

$1000

$21164.08

Intervention: = Students'literacy=20 scores will be improved through = Comprehensive=20 Literacy-Reading programs.

Scientific Based Research:=20 Allington, Richard. Classrooms That Work. = Harvey=20 Daniels: Best Practices. Classrooms that = Work:=20 They can all Read and Write, Publisher, = Pearson=20 Education; Pub. date: April 2002; Paul, = T.D., D.=20 VanderZee, R. Rue, and S. Swanson Impact = of=20 Accelerated Reader on Overall Academic = Achievement=20 School Attendance. Paper presented at the = National=20 Reading Research Center Conference on = Literacy=20 Technology for 21st Century, Atlanta, GA, = October,=20 1996. Madison, WI: Renaissance Learning, = 2001.=20 Reprint, Madison, WI: Renaissance = Learning, 2002;=20 = http://research.renlearn,com/research/pdfs/196.pdf=20 "Accelerated Reader/Reading Renaissance". = WWC=20 Intervention Report (April 2007)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

New teachers will be trained in ELLA, = ELF and=20 Accelerated Reader as needed.
Action = Type:=20 Professional Development
Action Type: = Title I=20 Schoolwide

Paula Edmonson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Outside = Consultants


ACTION BUDGET:	$

ELLA, ELF, Accelerated Reader and Direct = Instruction strategies will be evaluated=20 periodically to determine effectiveness.=20
Action Type: Program = Evaluation
Action=20 Type: Special Education

Paula Edmonson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Community Leaders
Computers
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Accelerated Reader books and tests along = with=20 additional high interest selections will = be=20 purchased and placed within the library = media=20 center and classrooms.
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: Special=20 Education
Action Type: Technology=20 Inclusion
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Suzie Rook

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

School Library
Teachers

$9664.08

Title V - Materials & = Supplies:	$1665.00
Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$7999.08

ACTION BUDGET:

Students will be required to take the = S.T.A.R.=20 test to determine the reading gains = achieved by=20 the implementation of Accelerated Reader = program,=20 ELLA activities, and independent reading=20 strategies.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type:=20 Equity
Action Type: Special = Education
Action=20 Type: Technology Inclusion
Action Type: = Title I=20 Schoolwide

Kerry Ponder

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Computers
Performance Assessments
School Library


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Workshops addressing learning = activities, SRA=20 materials, and technology will be provided = for=20 teachers.
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Professional Development

Paula Edmonson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Outside Consultants
Performance = Assessments


ACTION BUDGET:	$

ELLA activities will be implemented into = the=20 kindergarten literacy block.
Action = Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Title I Schoolwide

Paula Edmonson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teaching Aids

$1000

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$1000.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Students' TARGET testing scores will be=20 reviewed at intervals to determine student = gains=20 in literacy.
Action Type: = AIP/IRI
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Program=20 Evaluation
Action Type: Special=20 Education

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance = Assessments


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All third through fifth grade students = will be=20 assessed through TARGET testing=20 quarterly.
Action Type: = Alignment

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary staff will = disaggregate the=20 data from Augmented Benchmark, SAT 10, = STAR and=20 Target testing to evaluate the = effectiveness of=20 Comprehensive Literacy-Reading = programs.
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Program=20 Evaluation

Paula Edmonson

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Classroom literacy libraries will be=20 established at all grade levels ranging = from=20 Kindergarten to Grade 5 to increase = student=20 achievement. These strategies are part of = the=20 school wide project to enhance the = curriculum=20 opportunities and performance of all = students=20 served by the school wide = project.
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: Equity

Sherry Rainbolt

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers

$10500

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$10500.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Over the next four years Literacy Lab = training=20 will be provided for upper elementary=20 staff.
Action Type: Professional=20 Development

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Goal

All students will become more proficient in = writing=20 especially in the areas of style, content and = mechanics,=20 and in answering open-response questions as = determined=20 by the analysis of the data from Augmented = Benchmark and=20 Target testing.

Benchmark

As of the 2007-08 test results, the percentage = of=20 students scoring proficient or above on = Benchmark=20 literacy test was 73% with the state AYP being = 64% for=20 2008-09.

Intervention: At risk = students'=20 academic performance will be improved by = using=20 paraprofessionals in the classroom. =

Scientific Based Research: = "Where We=20 Stand: K-12 Literacy", American Federation = of=20 Teachers (AFT 2007); "The Paraprofessional = Role of=20 Connector, Ritu V. Chopra, Elena = Sandoval-Lucero,=20 Remedial and special Education, Vol. 25 = No. 4=20 (July/Aug. 2004)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

SRA materials will be purchased to work = with=20 children within the early childhood = development=20 program.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Equity
Action=20 Type: Title I Schoolwide

Marilyn McNair

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Performance Assessments
Teachers
Teaching Aids
Title Teachers

$12000

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$12000.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Three paraprofessionals at 100% FTE will = work=20 with students first through second grades = to=20 increase achievement in the Language Arts=20 curriculum.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Equity
Action=20 Type: Special Education
Action Type: = Title I=20 Schoolwide

Marilyn McNair

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers
Title Teachers

$66662

Title I - Employee Salaries:	$52501.00
Title I - Employee Benefits:	$14161.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Two paraprofessionals have been hired to = provide intervention strategies within the = Kindergarten classrooms.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Equity
Action=20 Type: Title I Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative = Staff

$43387

Title I - Employee Salaries:	$34134.00
Title I - Employee Benefits:	$9253.00

ACTION BUDGET:

Para professionals and teachers will = evaluate=20 periodically and yearly the progress made = by=20 targeted students through DIBELS, STAR. = TARGET,=20 Augmented Benchmark, SAT 10 and teacher = made=20 classroom assessments.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Program=20 Evaluation
Action Type: Special=20 Education
Action Type: Title I Target=20 Assistance

Stephanie Whited

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

$122049

$4018.4

Intervention: Students' = literacy=20 scores will be improved through the use of = comprehensive literacy-writing = programs.

Scientific Based Research: = Simon,=20 Jody. (July 2003). "Research basis for = Step Up To=20 Writing". Sopris West Educational = Services;=20 "Writing Next: Effective Strategies to = Improve=20 Writing of Adolescents", s. Graham & = D. Perin,=20 Carnegie Corporation, (2007)

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Step Up to Writing in 4th and 5th grades = and=20 Buckle Down in 3rd grade will be used to = improve=20 student literacy scores.
Action Type:=20 Alignment
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Equity
Action Type: Special=20 Education

Tonya Sneed

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance Assessments
Teachers
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Upon review of Augmented Benchmark = results,=20 literacy strategies will be evaluated and = revised=20 according to student = achievement.
Action Type:=20 Program Evaluation

Tonya Sneed

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance = Assessments


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Students' TARGET testing scores will be=20 reviewed at intervals to determine student = gains=20 in writng.
Action Type: = AIP/IRI
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Program=20 Evaluation
Action Type: Special=20 Education

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Performance = Assessments


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All third through fifth grade students = will be=20 assessed through TARGET testing=20 quarterly.
Action Type: = Alignment

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

In compliance with Act 307, Parent = Involvement=20 strategies will be integrated into all = areas of=20 the school environment.
Action Type: = Parental=20 Engagement
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide

Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Technology (Projectors, wireless = StarBoards,=20 Overhead Document Readers) along with = supporting=20 supplies and materials will be purchased = for all=20 elementary (K-5) classrooms to implement=20 instruction through alternative methods. = This=20 technology will be used for = student-designed=20 presentations, instructional information, = and as=20 an instructional tool within the = classrooms. These=20 strategies are part of the school wide = project to=20 enhance the curriculum opportunities and=20 performance of all students served by the = school=20 wide project.
Action Type: = Alignment
Action=20 Type: Equity
Action Type: Technology=20 Inclusion

Gary Rosa/Lewis Villines

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Computers
Teachers
Teaching Aids
Title Teachers

$4018.4

Title I - Materials & = Supplies:	$4018.40

ACTION BUDGET:

Total Budget:

Priority 4:

To implement health and safety strategies. =

Supporting Data:

According to the School Health Index = overall score=20 card, the eight modules were scored on a = variety of=20 items. Following are the results: Module 1 = School=20 Health Policies and Environment-78%; Module 2 = Health=20 Education-93%; Module 3 Physical Education and = other=20 Physical Activity- 87%; Module 4 Nutrition = Services-=20 60%; Module 5 School Health Services- 35%; = Module 6=20 School Counseling, Psychological, and Social=20 Services-100%; Module 7 Health Promotion for=20 Staff-33%; Module 8 Family and Community=20 Involvement-56%.=20
According to the Arkansas Center for = Health=20 Improvement report, Flippin Elementary School = students=20 had the following statistics: 2007-08 35.7% at = risk of=20 being over weight/overweight. 2006-07 34.4% at = risk of=20 being over weight/overweight. 2005-06 92% of = students=20 assessed: 37% At risk for being over=20 weight/overweight.

Goal

Flippin Elementary School will seek ways to = improve=20 the health and wellness of students.

Benchmark

Flippin Elementary students' BMIs will = decrease by=20 1% as reported by the Arkansas Center for Health = Improvement with 2007-08 BMI reported as 35.7% = of=20 students being identified as either at risk for = being=20 overweight or overweight.

Intervention: Staff and = students=20 will be educated on wellness to improve=20 understanding and mangement of health = issues.=20 (Module 1,5,7)

Scientific Based Research: = Asthma=20 and Children Fact Sheet-American Lung = Association=20 July 2005 www.lungusa.org

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

A policy has been written for self carry = and/or self administration of student = medications,=20 and has been written in the student = handbook. This=20 will continue to be monitored.
Action = Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: Parental=20 Engagement
Action Type: = Wellness

Brenda Moore

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Professional development will be = provided as=20 needed for staff on asthma management. The = staff=20 feels that this action has been successful = and=20 will be continued to be monitored. =
Action=20 Type: Professional Development
Action = Type:=20 Wellness

Brenda Moore

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

All students diagnosed with asthma will = have=20 asthma education annually.
Action Type: = Collaboration

Brenda Moore

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

The Parent Center will have available=20 information regarding asthma through = literature=20 and/or guest speakers.
Action Type: = Title I=20 Schoolwide
Action Type: = Wellness

Brenda Moore

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers
Teaching Aids


ACTION BUDGET:	$

The Wellness committee will evaluate = annually=20 the effectiveness of our wellnes program = and=20 identify at risk areas still needing=20 attention.
Action Type: = Collaboration
Action=20 Type: Parental Engagement
Action Type:=20 Professional Development
Action Type:=20 Wellness

Ronna Fulton

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Community Leaders
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Intervention: Flippin Public = Schools=20 will develop strategies for maintaining a = healthy=20 lifestyle.

Scientific Based Research:=20 "Guidelines for School Health Programs to = Promote=20 Lifelong Healthy Eating." Journal of = School=20 Health, January,1997; Vol.67.Issue 1,pg.42 = Database: Health Source: Nursing/Academic = Edition=20 http://web18.epnet.com

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

A workshop will be provided for the = community=20 on maintaining a healthy = lifestyle.
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Parental=20 Engagement
Action Type: = Wellness

Ronna Fulton

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Quarterly a "Health Focus Week" will be=20 conducted school wide through the = science/health=20 classes to promote a healthy = lifestyle.
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Parental=20 Engagement
Action Type: Title I=20 Schoolwide
Action Type: = Wellness

Jamie Landry

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Ronna Fulton

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Community Leaders
Outside Consultants
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Programs for stress and anger management = will=20 be provided for Flippin Elementary staff = and=20 students
Action Type: Equity
Action = Type:=20 Professional Development
Action Type:=20 Wellness

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Outside Consultants
Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Flippin Elementary staff and students = will=20 participate in morning exercises that = begin each=20 day led by the GT morning show.
Action = Type:=20 Technology Inclusion
Action Type:=20 Wellness

Beverly Gregory

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers
Title Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Intervention: Flippin = Elementary=20 school provide a safe school = environment.

Scientific Based Research:=20 www.svrc.net-School Violence Resource = Center=20 Strategies to Keep Schools Safe; Volokh, = Alexander=20 and Snell, Lisa; Policy Study No.234, = January,=20 1998.

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Staff and students will practice the = school=20 safety plan throughout the school = year.
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type:=20 Wellness

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Parents and community will be informed = of=20 safety procedures through handbook, = newsletters,=20 etc.
Action Type: Parental = Engagement
Action=20 Type: Wellness

Rhonda House

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Upon analysis of BMIs and the School = Health=20 Index, the plan will be evaluated and = revised=20 accordingly.
Action Type: Program=20 Evaluation
Action Type: = Wellness

Ronna Fulton

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Goal

The Flippin Elementary School will provide = support=20 for students in making Healthy Lifestyle Choices = by=20 implementing systems to aid in increasing = collaboration=20 between all segments of the school community in = support=20 of positive lifestyle choices.

Benchmark

By school year 2008-09 all students (K-5) will = participate in the CATCH nutrition education and = physical activity program.

Intervention: Flippin = Elementary=20 School will implement practices to provide = opportunities for students to practice = healthy=20 behaviors at school and encourage them to = make=20 healthy food and physical activity choices = resulting in increased academic = performance.

Scientific Based Research: = Journal=20 of American Medical Association. Luepker = RV, et al=20 (1996). JAMA, 275(10),768-76. Archives of=20 Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. Nader = PR, et al=20 (1999). Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 153(7),=20 695-704.

Actions

Person Responsible

Timeline

Resources

Source of Funds

Flippin Elementary School will continue = to=20 implement nutrition education and will = promote=20 physical activities into all grades = K-5.
Action=20 Type: Collaboration
Action Type: = Professional=20 Development
Action Type: = Wellness

Sonya Hall

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

District Staff
Outside = Consultants


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Classroom activties of CATCH will be=20 documented in lesson plans and through = principal=20 observations.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Wellness

Sonya Hall

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
District Staff


ACTION BUDGET:	$

The Wellness committee will evaluate = annually=20 the effectiveness of the CATCH=20 activities.
Action Type:=20 Collaboration
Action Type: = Wellness

Sonya Hall

Start: 07/01/2008
End: = 06/30/2009

Administrative Staff
Performance Assessments
Teachers


ACTION BUDGET:	$

Total Budget:

Planning Team

Classification Name Position Committee

Anita Stoner Paraprofessional Literacy/Science

Cindy Rogers Special Ed. = Paraprofessional Mission = Statement/Science

Danine Leaver Special Ed. = Paraprofessional/Parent=20 Center Parent = Engagement/Wellness

Debbie Stafford Paraprofessional Mission = statement/Literacy

Doreen Farris Lab Instructor Math

Katie Shrable classroom assistant Mission = Statement/Literacy

Marilyn Brown Sp. Ed. paraprofessional Wellness/Literacy

Marilyn McNair Paraprofessional Math/Wellness

Sherry Ford lab instructor Literacy

Tracie Howard Sp. Ed. paraprofessional Math

Wanda Carey paraprofessional Math

Classroom Teacher Anna Mattson Special Education Teacher Data Assessment/ACSIP=20 Co-chair/Science

Classroom Teacher Beverly Gregory G/T coordinator Data Assessment/Math

Classroom Teacher Darrah Black Fourth Grade Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Dinah Sisney Second Grade Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Donna Due Third Grade Teacher Math/Science

Classroom Teacher Gianna Sherry First Grade Teacher Literacy/Science

Classroom Teacher Jamie Landry Fifth Grade Teacher Science/Chairperson

Classroom Teacher John Eichman Art Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Karla Elliott Special Education Teacher Data = Assessment/Literacy

Classroom Teacher Kelly Downs Kindergarten Teacher Math

Classroom Teacher Kerry Ponder Second Grade Teacher Literacy/Wellness

Classroom Teacher Kristie Sumpter second grade teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Laura Proctor Kindergarten Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Lewonna Nelson Fourth Grade Teacher Math/Wellness

Classroom Teacher Linda Arnold Third Grade Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Lindsay Newton Kindergarten Teacher Math/Science

Classroom Teacher Marilyn Muehler fourth grade teacher Literacy/ ACSIP = Co-chair

Classroom Teacher Michelle Curtis Fifth Grade Teacher Data = Assessment/Math/Chairperson

Classroom Teacher Pam Hudson First Grade Teacher Math/Parent=20 Engagement/Chairperson

Classroom Teacher Paula Edmonson First Grade Teacher Literacy

Classroom Teacher Rhonda Wagoner Kindergarten Teacher Literacy/Wellness

Classroom Teacher Ronna Fulton First Grade Teacher Math/Wellness-Chairperson

Classroom Teacher Shannon King Fourth Grade Teacher Data = Assessment/Science

Classroom Teacher Shelly Sanders Third Grade Teacher Math/Data assessment

Classroom Teacher Shelly Xiques Music Teacher Mission = Statement/Math

Classroom Teacher Sherry Rainbolt Fifth Grade Teacher Literacy/Chairperson

Classroom Teacher Sonya Hall P.E. Instructor Mission Statement = /Wellness

Classroom Teacher Stephanie Whited Second Grade Teacher Math/Wellness

Classroom Teacher Terri Harmon Second Grade Teacher Math/Science

Classroom Teacher Tonya Sneed fifth grade teacher Literacy

Non-Classroom Professional = Staff Brenda Moore School nurse Wellness

Non-Classroom Professional = Staff Rhonda House Counselor Data Assessment

Non-Classroom Professional = Staff Susan Leonard Speech Therapist Literacy/Wellness

Non-Classroom Professional = Staff Suzie Rook Media Specialist Literacy

Principal Lewis Villines Principal Parent = Engagement

=20

------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C94000.9EA65B90 Content-Type: text/css; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: http://acsip.state.ar.us/css/styles.css BODY { FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: #000000; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, = Helvetica, sans-serif } .text { FONT-SIZE: 11px; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif } .priority { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 14px } .goal { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12px } TABLE { FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: #000000; TEXT-DECORATION: none } TD { FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: #000000; TEXT-DECORATION: none } TD.content { FONT-SIZE: 12px; LINE-HEIGHT: 140%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, = Helvetica, sans-serif } P.content { FONT-SIZE: 11px; LINE-HEIGHT: 140%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, = Helvetica, sans-serif } P.bold { PADDING-RIGHT: 12px; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 11px; COLOR: = #222222; LINE-HEIGHT: 140%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, = sans-serif } .title { PADDING-LEFT: 12px; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 18px; LINE-HEIGHT: = 140%; PADDING-TOP: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana } .login { PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: = 11px; COLOR: #222222; LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; = TEXT-DECORATION: none } .boxtitle { PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: = 11px; COLOR: #222222; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; = TEXT-DECORATION: none } .box { PADDING-RIGHT: 3px; PADDING-LEFT: 3px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: = 11px; COLOR: #222222; LINE-HEIGHT: 150%; FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; = TEXT-DECORATION: none } .bold { FONT-WEIGHT: bold } .btn { PADDING-RIGHT: 12px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: = 10px; PADDING-BOTTOM: 12px; LINE-HEIGHT: 200%; PADDING-TOP: 12px; = FONT-FAMILY: Verdana; TEXT-DECORATION: none } A:link { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #0066cc; TEXT-DECORATION: = none } A:hover { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #cc3300; TEXT-DECORATION: = none } A:visited { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #0066cc; TEXT-DECORATION: = none } A:active { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #0066cc; TEXT-DECORATION: = none } .error { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 14px; COLOR: #ff0000 } .generictable { BACKGROUND-COLOR: #505153 } TH.generic { PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-SIZE: 10px; PADDING-BOTTOM: = 2px; PADDING-TOP: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ccccff } TD.generic { PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-SIZE: 10px; PADDING-BOTTOM: = 2px; PADDING-TOP: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff } TD.genericborder { PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-SIZE: 10px; PADDING-BOTTOM: = 2px; PADDING-TOP: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00 } TD.genericlow { PADDING-RIGHT: 2px; PADDING-LEFT: 2px; FONT-SIZE: 10px; PADDING-BOTTOM: = 2px; PADDING-TOP: 2px; BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ff6600 } .redmenu { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12px; COLOR: #ffffff; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, = Helvetica, sans-serif } .graymenu { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 12px; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, = Helvetica, sans-serif } .sectiontitle { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; FONT-SIZE: 18px; COLOR: #081a7e; FONT-FAMILY: = Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif } .content { FONT-SIZE: 14px; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, = sans-serif } .contentfine { FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #333333; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica, = sans-serif } .error { FONT-WEIGHT: bold; COLOR: #ff0000 } .file SPAN { DISPLAY: block } .file .fileheader { COLOR: #888 } .file .hunkheader { COLOR: #888 } .file .hunk .ctx { BACKGROUND: #eee } .file .hunk INS { DISPLAY: block; BACKGROUND: #dfd; TEXT-DECORATION: none } .file .hunk DEL { DISPLAY: block; BACKGROUND: #fdd; TEXT-DECORATION: none } ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01C94000.9EA65B90--